<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highlights of the 2009 Form 5500 Schedule C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/comment-page-1/#comment-4703</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightscope.com/blog/?p=491#comment-4703</guid>
		<description>Ed-

The latest Schedule C changes go in to effect for the 2009 plan year and primarily effect large (&gt;100 participant) plans. I believe the GAO is going to review the new Schedule C to ensure it goes &quot;far enough&quot; in requiring fee disclosure. Your guess is as good as mine when it comes to future Schedule C changes, though I do suspect that the dust has far from settled.

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed-</p>
<p>The latest Schedule C changes go in to effect for the 2009 plan year and primarily effect large (>100 participant) plans. I believe the GAO is going to review the new Schedule C to ensure it goes &#8220;far enough&#8221; in requiring fee disclosure. Your guess is as good as mine when it comes to future Schedule C changes, though I do suspect that the dust has far from settled.</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/comment-page-1/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightscope.com/blog/?p=491#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>Do you know where I can find information on the DOL&#039;s future plans in terms of a systematic way of 5500 reporting? in other words, do you have any information on what the DOL&#039;s system requirements might be for future 5500 schedule c reporting?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know where I can find information on the DOL&#8217;s future plans in terms of a systematic way of 5500 reporting? in other words, do you have any information on what the DOL&#8217;s system requirements might be for future 5500 schedule c reporting?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

