<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investment Advice and Retirement Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/08/03/investment-advice-and-retirement-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/08/03/investment-advice-and-retirement-plans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/08/03/investment-advice-and-retirement-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightscope.com/blog/?p=937#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, Ryan. This article by Jan Sackley also takes the dialogue to a new level of nuance: http://tiny.cc/HUtZA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, Ryan. This article by Jan Sackley also takes the dialogue to a new level of nuance: <a href="http://tiny.cc/HUtZA" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/HUtZA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett Aikin</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/08/03/investment-advice-and-retirement-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-4372</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennett Aikin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightscope.com/blog/?p=937#comment-4372</guid>
		<description>Great post Ryan, it is the broker-dealers who have come to resemble advice providers as covered under the Investment Advisers Act, so it only makes sense that they should be held to those same standards.
 
I would also add to your list of those in support of the existing standard SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar, whose proposal for a fiduciary standard has heavily influenced both fi360 and The Commission for the Fiduciary Standard. See our blog posts from May 26 (http://blog.fi360.com/fi360_blog/2009/05/new-clarity-in-the-regulatory-debate.html) and June 1 (http://blog.fi360.com/fi360_blog/2009/06/rally-around-aguilar.html) for more information and links to Aguilar&#039;s proposals, which advocate bringing all provision of investment advice under the standards of the Investment Advisers Act and oversight by a more fully resourced SEC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ryan, it is the broker-dealers who have come to resemble advice providers as covered under the Investment Advisers Act, so it only makes sense that they should be held to those same standards.</p>
<p>I would also add to your list of those in support of the existing standard SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar, whose proposal for a fiduciary standard has heavily influenced both fi360 and The Commission for the Fiduciary Standard. See our blog posts from May 26 (<a href="http://blog.fi360.com/fi360_blog/2009/05/new-clarity-in-the-regulatory-debate.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fi360.com/fi360_blog/2009/05/new-clarity-in-the-regulatory-debate.html</a>) and June 1 (<a href="http://blog.fi360.com/fi360_blog/2009/06/rally-around-aguilar.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fi360.com/fi360_blog/2009/06/rally-around-aguilar.html</a>) for more information and links to Aguilar&#8217;s proposals, which advocate bringing all provision of investment advice under the standards of the Investment Advisers Act and oversight by a more fully resourced SEC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

