<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BrightScope Blog &#187; DOL Regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brightscope.com/blog/category/regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Highlights of the 2009 Form 5500 Schedule C</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Alfred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightscope.com/blog/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people have asked about the new 2009 Schedule C requirements, so I felt it was time to do a quick overview.
Major Changes:

Direct vs. Indirect Fees:  Fees are separated into those paid directly by the plan and those received indirectly from another service provider.

New Language: &#8220;You must complete this Part, in accordance with the instructions, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/04/24/highlights-of-the-2009-form-5500-schedule-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New EBSA Nominee: Phyllis Borzi</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/03/30/new-ebsa-nominee-phyllis-borzi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/03/30/new-ebsa-nominee-phyllis-borzi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Alfred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightscope.com/blog/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Barack Obama announced his pick to head the EBSA.  At the ASPPA conference last week many people were anxiously awaiting the nomination.  It seems things at the DOL slow down a bit when the new administration isn&#8217;t fully in place.  We think that this is a very important role in the administration and are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/03/30/new-ebsa-nominee-phyllis-borzi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illuminating the Battle Lines Around 401k Fee Disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/01/26/illuminating-the-battle-lines-around-401k-fee-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/01/26/illuminating-the-battle-lines-around-401k-fee-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Alfred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.brightscope.com/blog/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent some time digging through the public comments to the rule proposed by the DOL on 12/13/2008 relating to Regulation 408(b)(2).  The comments paint a very clear picture about where individual firms and industry trade groups fall on each side of the debate. The battle lines have been drawn along the lines of economic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/01/26/illuminating-the-battle-lines-around-401k-fee-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on 408(b)(2)</title>
		<link>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/01/17/update-on-408b2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/01/17/update-on-408b2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Alfred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.brightscope.com/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fi360 blog is reporting that the DOL is expected to withdraw 408(b)(2) and the regulations on participant disclosures. For those not familiar with 408(b)(2), it is the proposed Department of Labor regulation that aims to provide more effective disclosure of indirect compensation by plan service providers. The withdrawal of the regulation would be a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brightscope.com/blog/2009/01/17/update-on-408b2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
